- Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week
- - SE HABLA ESPAÑOL
- Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week
- - SE HABLA ESPAÑOL
California Labor Code §1102.5 protects employees — including sales representatives, account executives, and senior employees — who report violations of wage law to a supervisor, manager, or government agency. Labor Code §98.6 prohibits retaliation against any worker for asserting Labor Code rights, including the right to be paid earned commissions, bonuses, and final wages. If you were fired, demoted, pushed out, or constructively discharged after raising a wage or commission dispute, the unpaid-commission question becomes the predicate. The real claim is wrongful termination. Mercer Legal Group, headquartered in Los Angeles, California, represents California employees in §1102.5, §98.6, and Tameny wrongful-termination cases tied to commission and wage disputes.
Most workers who raise an unpaid-commission issue think the legal question is “how do I get the commission paid.” That is a wage-claim question and California’s DLSE process is designed for it. The wrongful-termination question is different. It begins the moment your employer’s response to the complaint is to push you out — termination, demotion, constructive discharge, schedule reductions, sudden write-ups, removal from active accounts, or freezing you out of the pipeline.
California treats commissions as wages once they are earned (Labor Code §204.1; Schachter v. Citigroup, Inc. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 610). When an employer retaliates against an employee for asserting the right to that wage, three causes of action become available: §1102.5 whistleblower retaliation, §98.6 anti-retaliation under the Labor Code, and a Tameny common-law wrongful-termination claim. Together they carry damages that look nothing like a pure wage claim.
Fired Before a Large Commission Vests. The employee is terminated days or weeks before a deal closes, a vesting date hits, or a quarter-end true-up runs. Under Schachter, commissions earned before termination are still owed; the employer’s strategy is to argue they were never earned. The retaliation case turns on whether the firing was tied to the complaint.
Fired After a Comp-Plan Change Dispute. The employer announces a retroactive change to the commission structure that lowers the worker’s earned compensation. The worker pushes back in writing, and within weeks is terminated for “fit,” “performance,” or “restructuring.”
Constructive Discharge After a Bonus Dispute. Senior employees who raise a bonus dispute often find their accounts reassigned, the pipeline frozen, and key relationships rerouted. When the role becomes unworkable and they resign, the resignation can be treated as a constructive discharge.
Removed From Active Accounts After Raising Final-Paycheck Issues. A worker on the way out raises §203 waiting-time penalties or missing final commissions. The employer responds by accelerating the separation and pulling the worker from active accounts to deny commissions on in-flight deals.
Pretextual Performance Write-Ups Following a Commission Complaint. A wave of write-ups for issues that were never raised before the complaint, used to support an eventual termination decision.
employment
Personal Injury
A direct unpaid-commission claim turns on the commission agreement and the math: what was earned, what was paid, what waiting-time penalties accrue under §203. The DLSE process handles those cases. The damages are bounded by the math.
A wrongful-termination case is different. It turns on the link between what you said and what your employer did next. The evidence shifts from commission spreadsheets to personnel files, comparator-employee records, witness statements, and the timeline between the complaint and the firing. The damages model expands to lost wages from termination through trial, future earnings, lost benefits, emotional distress damages under Tameny, and — where the conduct was malicious or oppressive — punitive damages under Civil Code §3294.
The two cases require different proof, different witnesses, and different trial strategy. A firm that handles only wage-claim collection work is the wrong fit for a wrongful-termination case driven by a commission dispute. We pursue the wrongful-termination claim and use the underlying wage dispute as predicate, not as the headline cause of action.
Mercer Legal Group is headquartered in Los Angeles, California. Our practice is built around employees who were fired, demoted, or pushed out for asserting workplace rights — retaliation, wrongful termination, harassment, and discrimination. We do not represent workers in pure wage-claim collection actions; DLSE practice and PAGA-style class actions are different kinds of work.
What we do is take the conduct that drove an employer to retaliate against a commission or wage complaint — and prosecute the wrongful termination that followed. Our managing attorney, Simon Moshkovich, has tried California employment cases to verdict and represents sales representatives, account executives, and senior employees across Los Angeles, Orange County, the Inland Empire, and the broader Southern California region.
We start by mapping the timeline: when the commission or wage issue arose, when you raised it, who you raised it to, and when the adverse action followed. We pull the documentary evidence — commission agreement, comp plan history, pipeline reports, account assignments, sales records — to confirm a good-faith basis for the original complaint.
From there we build the causal evidence: personnel file under Labor Code §1198.5, comparator records showing how the employer treated workers who did not complain, witness statements from co-workers who saw the shift in treatment, and internal communications referencing the complaint. We engage damages experts when the case warrants — economic-loss experts for lost earning capacity, commission-structure experts for the underlying wage component, and mental-health treaters when emotional distress is a material part of damages.
The damages model in a wrongful-termination case tied to a commission dispute is materially larger than a wage-claim recovery:
A pure wage-claim plaintiff who recovers $12,000 in unpaid commissions plus §203 waiting-time walks away with a defined number. A wrongful-termination plaintiff who was fired over the same commission dispute can recover months or years of compensation, plus the underlying commission as predicate, plus emotional distress, plus potentially punitives. The cause of action drives the math.
Statute of limitations: §1102.5 — three years from the adverse action under AB 1947. Tameny common-law wrongful-termination — two years. FEHA retaliation (if a protected category overlay applies) — three years to file with the California Civil Rights Department, then one year on the right-to-sue notice. The underlying commission claim has its own deadline (three years for statutory wage claims, four years for breach of written contract).
If you were fired, demoted, or pushed out after raising a commission, bonus, or wage dispute, Mercer Legal Group can evaluate your wrongful-termination case. We handle these matters on a contingency basis — no fee unless we recover. Call 213-985-3909 or fill out the case-evaluation form on this page.
A wrongful-termination case driven by a commission or wage dispute raises a different set of questions than a pure wage claim. The questions below are the ones we hear most often during intake.
It can be. Under Schachter v. Citigroup, Inc. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 610, a commission is earned when the employee satisfies the conditions in the commission agreement — not when the employer chooses to pay it. If you were terminated specifically to avoid paying an earned or about-to-be-earned commission, you have both a wage claim (for the unpaid commission) and a potential wrongful-termination claim. The timing — how close the firing was to the commission trigger — is what California courts look at as circumstantial evidence of causation.
It can be. Raising a written objection to a comp-plan change that lowers earned compensation is protected activity under §1102.5 and §98.6 when the underlying conduct (retroactive change to earned wages) violates California wage law. A two-week gap between the complaint and the firing is short enough to support an inference of retaliation. The next question is whether the stated reason for the firing holds up against the documentary record.
Section 98.6 protects internal complaints — telling a supervisor, raising the issue in a team meeting, or putting it in an email or HR portal. Section 1102.5 can also protect certain internal reports to supervisors or managers when the employee reports a suspected legal violation. A formal Labor Commissioner filing is not required for the protection to attach.
Possibly. California recognizes constructive discharge: when an employer makes the working conditions so intolerable that a reasonable person in the employee’s position would feel compelled to resign, the resignation is treated as a termination. The conduct has to be material, not merely uncomfortable. Account reassignment that effectively zeros out earning capacity, combined with a frozen pipeline, can meet the bar — but the facts matter. We evaluate borderline situations during intake.
It is the most common defense. The case is built on what the documentary record actually shows: were the performance issues raised before the commission complaint, do the disciplinary policies apply to other workers the same way, does the personnel file support the explanation? A “performance” rationale that appears only after the protected activity, and only against the complaining employee, is the pattern pretext is built from.
It depends on the cause of action. §1102.5 whistleblower retaliation has a three-year statute of limitations from the adverse action under AB 1947. A Tameny common-law wrongful-termination claim has a two-year limit under the personal-injury statute. A FEHA retaliation claim (if there is a discrimination overlay) requires filing with the California Civil Rights Department within three years, then suing within one year of the right-to-sue notice. The underlying unpaid-commission claim has its own deadline — three years for statutory wage claims, four years for breach of a written commission agreement.
It applies. Labor Code §1102.5 and §98.6 cover all employees, including senior employees and executives. Tameny wrongful-termination claims are available regardless of role. The legal analysis is the same; the documentary record and the damages model differ — executive comp packages, equity vesting, bonus structures, and severance terms create more complex damages calculations and often higher case values.
